Timelines / Milestones ?
Halibut: (~June 8th)
sessionmanager with udev detection
appfw/security portal w/ smack / named sockets
volume controls
input w/o buffer
? bluetooth ?
config api evolution in parallel
Icefish: (~Nov 22nd)
sessionmanager with config IF and unicens support
bluetooth
policy plugin
input path for voice w/ buffer available
device↔device link (KF radio)
What needs to be ported, who and when ?
Discussion on Architecture and Requirements
Notes during the meeting:
Topics to discuss:
Architecture discussion
specialized HW
special controls
Sound from remote devices
tcp/ip
can connect
Architecture Diagram to start with:https://confluence.automotivelinux.org/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=9404429&draftShareId=03363209-aee5-4d35-9e96-cd70b5b1ffea&#
session manager able to configure dsp?
one client per each ALSA device in case of hardware mixing
open/ proprietary networkmanager separate!
external (zephyr/autosar) devices reserve/create ressource
Gateway/Portal handling ressource/ACL management. Returning ressource URI (socket or network endpoint) ?
George: original idea is to create and configure the pipewire socket; more discussion needed
Potentially desired mechanism for content protection:
1) client connects using (no / invalid) token
2) service reacts with refusal and ID/Link to authority
3) client connects to authority
4) authority grants token
5) client connects to service w/ new token
6) service checks token with authority
7) authority verifies token
8) access granted
→ similar / equal to oauth/openID mechanism
Summary #1:
In a car we have (proprietary) network managers. The pipewire session manager needs to communicate with these and provide an API.
Similar for copy protection mechanisms.
Thus session manager cannot (shouldn't try) to abstract all of these.
System management might be on external hardware
Security provided by a gateway/portal that handles ressource managment and authoriztion.
Need to take HDCP/content protection in mind (e.g. widevine)
TODO: Session Manager first.
Issues:
static and/or default config vs dynamic configuration at runtime
handle device removal
graph inplemented in HW level
kernel-based security
content protection
role of the gateway
external authority ?