Content Comparison

...

1. Recap of Recent Events

   1. AGL AMM Spring

      1. Three Two in-person meetings regarding OSPO-EG (Feb. 25 before SC, Feb. 26 OSPO-EG Updates session, Feb. 28 workshop), and we got several important comments / questions and discussion.

         1. What is the most important among OSPO activities (Strategy, Compliance, Contribution)?

         2. (Quantitative) KPI of OSPO activities

         3. …

   2. OpenChain JapanWG Community Day Recall

      1. Mar. 3-4

         1. Panel Discussion

            • “Your OSPO is not my OSPO“

            • Some companies started OSPO formation from SBOM handling.

            • …

2. Executive Deck Review Status

   • English Expression Improvement → Reflected comments from Philipp

   • Section 1.3 wording: “Consumption” instead of “Usage“  → “Usage”

   • Chapter 2 cover slide wording: “Opportunities” or “Benefits” --> “Opportunities”

   • “Usage or Contribution” per each slide

     • Section 1.3 “Usage and Contribution” is not described/mentioned later chapters, especiially Chapter 2(“Opportunities”) and Chapter 3(“Management” to control “Risks”).

     • Discussion to put badge(s) (“Usage“ or/and “Contribution“ ) in the title line of each slide. But, many slides have both aspects. Endo-san will update slides.

   • “2.1 Ecosystem“

     • Ecosystem has 2 sides. One is to be the leader of leaders as a winner of competition, the other is sharing a set of software components as a kind of common property to be maintained/improved collectively. Philipp’s statement (already reflected) covers both (IMHO). Endo-san has another idea.

   • Consider to add (example) KPIs