/
2025-05-13-OSPO-EG

2025-05-13-OSPO-EG

Date/Time

Apr. 15, 2025, 12:00am (UTC) / 09:00pm(JST) via Zoom

Attendees

  • Masanori Itoh (Toyota)

  • Hiroyuki Ishii (Panasonic)

  • Masato Endo (Toyota)

  • Walt (Linux Foundation)

  • Naoto Yamaguchi (Aisin)

  • Tokita Hiroshi

  • Keiya Nobuta (Fujitsu)

  • Junya Nakamura

  • Nobuyoki Yamada (Aisin)

Discussion Materials

  • English checked and art work improved presentation deck (v0.7.0)

    •  

 

Version 0.72 with Itoh-san’s comments incorporated.

 

Next Meeting

May. 27

Agenda/Minutes

  1. Final check of the OSS & Promotion deck status (Itoh, Walt)

  2. Discussion of Next Actions (continued from Apr. 15 meeting) (Itoh, Endo, Ishii)

  3. x

Discussion

  • OSS & Promotion deck final check

    • After this final check, let’s submit to AB for 2 weeks review (as discussed before including Dan)

    • pre-check notes from Itoh (Toyota)

      • I found a remaining comment from Ana in slide 15 (this is a mistake of Itoh). To be removed.

      • Appearance of slide 11 (“2-2 Proven Benefits Across Quality, Cost, and Delivery (QCD)”) was greatly changed. I would like to confirm if this the intention of the art work improvement as this slide is the only one with blue-backed template. But as a whole, I this this improvement.

        • image-20250424-045310.png
          x

      • At least for me (seeing the 0.7.1 on Windows using PowerPoint), bullets for “Innovation” and “Industry“ look like below screen shot, meaning 'a question mark within a box'. I wanted to confirm this is the intention of the art work improvement or not.

        • スクリーンショット 2025-04-23 222846-20250423-132847.png

        • Walt’s version. See comment.

        • OSS & OSPO Promotion Slides for Automotive Companies_Ver0.7.2.png

           

    • Review comments from Ishii

      • P.2. Do we need this unti-trust policy?

      • P.4. Style inconsistency:

        image-20250508-083211.png

    • Art work improvement status confirmation.

      • If we need to do some more appearance improvement by ourselves, need the final PowerPoint.

      • (discussion)

    • How we can submit to AB for 2 weeks review.

  • Next Actions (Itoh, Endo, Ishii)

    • Survey for factors preventing OSS contribution

      • Status

        • Pre-interview results to get ready for creating effective questionaries in the survey

          • Question

            • What do you think are the main factors preventing engagement in community activities or contributions? (Both personal and company-related reasons are acceptable.)

          • Target Audience

            • People who are interested in contributing to open-source community activities but have not yet participated.

          • Special thanks to:

            • NISSAN, AISIN, Panasonic, Renesas, FUJITSU, DENSO, TOYOTA

        • Draft survey questionaries completed

          • English version :

          • Japanese version :

        • Review the draft in this call.

      • How we can carry out the survey?

        • Possible to ask LF Research for help?

        • Look for some survey system?

      • discussion

        • Walt can help us to add some attribute related questions and talk to LF Research.

        • Privacy issue is important (Endo)

        • Multiple language survey possible? (Especially for Japanese guys in Japanese)

          • To have more than 2 question sites. Walt to ask LF (Research)

        • Add (overall) introduction and description (of each question) → Itoh to work on this.

    • Blog post (before the July AMM)

      • To be discussed.

      • blog post contents

        • executive deck

        • asking for answering the survey

        • other OSPO-EG activities

      • Endo-san will draft the blog and submit to Walt/LF.